Introduction: Poststernotomy mediastinitis (PSM) is a critical and life-threatening complication that can arise after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional methods in the management of mediastinitis following heart surgery with a focus on Asian populations.
Methods: For this retrospective study, we included and evaluated a total of 34 patients who had undergone cardiac operations between January 2011 and September 2021 and developed PSM. The patients were divided into two groups, the NPWT group (n = 16, 47.1%) and the conventional treatment group (n = 18, 52.9%), and compared.
Results: The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of patient characteristics, PSM wound classification based on the El Oakley classification, and wound closure methods, but there was a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus in the NPWT group. With regard to mediastinal cultures, a higher prevalence of Staphylococcus epidermidis was observed in the NPWT group. However, we found no significant differences between the two groups regarding the time interval from diagnosis to wound closure, hospitalization duration, and re-exploration rate. Notably, the NPWT group exhibited a significantly higher in-hospital mortality rate than the conventional treatment group (p = 0.024).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the use of NPWT might not lead to improved medical outcomes for patients with PSM when compared to conventional treatment methods. As a result, it becomes imperative to exercise great care when choosing patients for NPWT. To obtain more definitive and conclusive results and identify the most appropriate cases for NPWT, conducting larger randomized clinical trials is necessary.
Keywords: conventional treatment; negative pressure wound therapy; poststernotomy mediastinitis.
© 2023 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.