Light wavelength and pulsing frequency affect avoidance responses of Canada geese

PeerJ. 2023 Nov 21:11:e16379. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16379. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Collisions between birds and aircraft cause bird mortality, economic damage, and aviation safety hazards. One proposed solution to increasing the distance at which birds detect and move away from an approaching aircraft, ultimately mitigating the probability of collision, is through onboard lighting systems. Lights in vehicles have been shown to lead to earlier reactions in some bird species but they could also generate attraction, potentially increasing the probability of collision. Using information on the visual system of the Canada goose (Branta canadensis), we developed light stimuli of high chromatic contrast to their eyes. We then conducted a controlled behavioral experiment (i.e., single-choice test) to assess the avoidance or attraction responses of Canada geese to LED lights of different wavelengths (blue, 483 nm; red, 631 nm) and pulsing frequencies (steady, pulsing at 2 Hz). Overall, Canada geese tended to avoid the blue light and move towards the red light; however, these responses depended heavily on light exposure order. At the beginning of the experiment, geese tended to avoid the red light. After further exposure the birds developed an attraction to the red light, consistent with the mere exposure effect. The response to the blue light generally followed a U-shape relationship (avoidance, attraction, avoidance) with increasing number of exposures, again consistent with the mere exposure effect, but followed by the satiation effect. Lights pulsing at 2 Hz enhanced avoidance responses under high ambient light conditions; whereas steady lights enhanced avoidance responses under dim ambient light conditions. Our results have implications for the design of lighting systems aimed at mitigating collisions between birds and human objects. LED lights in the blue portion of the spectrum are good candidates for deterrents and lights in the red portion of the spectrum may be counterproductive given the attraction effects with increasing exposure. Additionally, consideration should be given to systems that automatically modify pulsing of the light depending on ambient light intensity to enhance avoidance.

Keywords: Animal-vehicle collisions; Animal–aircraft collisions; Avian deterrent; Avoidance behavior; Choice test; LED lights; Light deterrent; Visual modeling.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Canada
  • Ducks
  • Eye
  • Geese* / physiology
  • Humans
  • Light*
  • Lighting / adverse effects

Grants and funding

Our work was funded via the Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (WS), National Wildlife Research Center (FAIN: AP22WSNWRC00C006), and based on funding received by WS via the Interagency Agreement with the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Interagency No. 692M15-19-T-00017). Findings reported herein do not necessarily reflect the policy of the FAA. The development of the light stimulus at Rensselaer’s Lighting Research Center was funded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under Cooperative Agreement Number 692M151940010 “Lighting and Visual Guidance Research for Airport Applications.” The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.