Background: The diagnosis of lung cancer is based on the microscopic exam of tissue or liquid. During the recent decade, many biomarkers have been pointed to have a potential diagnostic role. These biomarkers may be assessed in blood, pleural effusion or sputum and they could avoid biopsies or other risky procedures. The authors aimed to assess the diagnostic performances of biomarkers focusing on micro-RNA and metabolites.
Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted under the PRISMA guidelines during a nine-year-period (2013-2022). the Meta-Disc software 5.4 (free version) was used. Q test and I2 statistics were carried out to explore the heterogeneity among studies. Meta-regression was performed in case of significant heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using the funnel plot test and the Egger's test (free version JASP).
Results: According to our inclusion criteria, 165 studies from 79 articles were included. The pooled SEN, SPE and dOR accounted, respectively, for 0.76, 0.79 and 13.927. The AUC was estimated to 0.859 suggesting a good diagnostic accuracy. The heterogeneity in the pooled SEN and SPE was statistically significant. The meta-regression analysis focusing on the technique used, the sample, the number of biomarkers, the biomarker subtype, the tumor stage and the ethnicity revealed the biomarker number (p = 0.009) and the tumor stage (p = 0.0241) as potential sources of heterogeneity.
Conclusion: Even if this meta-analysis highlighted the potential diagnostic utility of biomarkers, more prospective studies should be performed, especially to assess the biomarkers' diagnostic potential in early-stage lung cancers.
Keywords: Biomarkers; diagnostic odds ratio; lung cancer; metabolites; micro-RNA; sensitivity; specificity.