Effects of Increasing the Orthodontic Forces over Cortical and Trabecular Bone during Periodontal Breakdown-A Finite Elements Analysis

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Nov 7;59(11):1964. doi: 10.3390/medicina59111964.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Herein we used numerical analysis to study different biomechanical behaviors of mandibular bone subjected to 0.6 N, 1.2 N, and 2.4 N orthodontic loads during 0-8 mm periodontal breakdown using the Tresca failure criterion. Additionally, correlations with earlier FEA reports found potential ischemic and resorptive risks. Materials and Methods: Eighty-one models (nine patients) and 243 simulations (intrusion, extrusion, rotation, tipping, and translation) were analyzed. Results: Intrusion and extrusion displayed after 4 mm bone loss showed extended stress display in the apical and middle third alveolar sockets, showing higher ischemic and resorptive risks for 0.6 N. Rotation, translation, and tipping displayed the highest stress amounts, and cervical-third stress with higher ischemic and resorptive risks after 4 mm loss for 0.6 N. Conclusions: Quantitatively, rotation, translation, and tipping are the most stressful movements. All three applied forces produced similar stress-display areas for all movements and bone levels. The stress doubled for 1.2 N and quadrupled for 2.4 N when compared with 0.6 N. The differences between the three loads consisted of the stress amounts displayed in color-coded areas, while their location and extension remained constant. Since the MHP was exceeded, a reduction in the applied force to under 0.6 N (after 4 mm of bone loss) is recommended for reducing ischemic and resorptive risks. The stress-display pattern correlated with horizontal periodontal-breakdown simulations.

Keywords: Finite Elements Analysis; bone loss; failure criteria; orthodontic force; orthodontic movements; periodontal breakdown.

MeSH terms

  • Cancellous Bone*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Humans
  • Periodontal Ligament
  • Tooth Movement Techniques* / adverse effects

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.