Whole-brain imaging is important for understanding brain functions through deciphering tissue structures, neuronal circuits, and single-neuron tracing. Thus, many clearing methods have been developed to acquire whole-brain images or images of three-dimensional thick tissues. However, there are several limitations to imaging whole-brain volumes, including long image acquisition times, large volumes of data, and a long post-image process. Based on these limitations, many researchers are unsure about which light microscopy is most suitable for imaging thick tissues. Here, we compared fast-confocal microscopy with light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for whole-brain three-dimensional imaging, which can acquire images the fastest. To compare the two types of microscopies for large-volume imaging, we performed tissue clearing of a whole mouse brain, and changed the sample chamber and low- magnification objective lens and modified the sample holder of a light-sheet fluorescence microscope. We found out that light-sheet fluorescence microscopy using a 2.5× objective lens possesses several advantages, including saving time, large-volume image acquisitions, and high Z-resolution, over fast-confocal microscopy, which uses a 4× objective lens. Therefore, we suggest that light-sheet fluorescence microscopy is suitable for whole mouse brain imaging and for obtaining high-resolution three-dimensional images.
Keywords: fast confocal microscopy; light sheet fluorescence microscopy; three-dimensional mouse brain imaging; tissue clearing.