Purpose: Despite its limitations, the cytology of body fluids is widely used in diagnosing neoplastic cells. Flow cytometry detects and identifies individual cells, enabling the detection of circulating tumor cells and facilitating diagnosis. This study compared the diagnostic utility of flow cytometry and cytology for detecting cancer cells in peritoneal and pleural fluids.
Methodology: We used flow cytometry and cytology to examine 119 pleural and peritoneal effusions received for routine screening. Antibodies against clusters of differentiation 45 (CD45), 14 (CD14), and Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) were used to detect malignant cells. Based on combined clinical and diagnostic information, 37 fluid specimens were malignant, and 77 were benign.
Results: Flow cytometry correctly identified 34 cancers, while cytology identified 26 cancers (sensitivity 91.89 % vs. 70.27, respectively). Both methods had equal specificity (98.7 %). At a cut-off of > 0.29 % EpCAM(+) cells to all cells in the samples, flow cytometry accurately detected cancer cells, achieving 89.2 % sensitivity, 90.9 % specificity, and an AUC of 0.959 (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Flow cytometry improves the detection of epithelial cancer cells in peritoneal and pleural fluids compared to conventional cytology. Due to similar specificity and higher sensitivity, flow cytometry offers a promising alternative to cytology for patient screening.
Keywords: Body fluids; Circulating tumor cells; Cytology; EpCAM; Flow cytometry; Neoplasms.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.