Preventive interventions that are effective in reducing the incidence of mental disorders in adolescence and early adulthood may impact substantially on lifetime economic, educational, and health outcomes; however, relatively few studies have examined the capacity of alternative approaches to preventing youth mental disorders (specifically, universal, selective, and indicated prevention) to reduce disorder incidence at a population level. Using a dynamic model of the onset of non-specific, relatively mild symptoms and progression to more severe disease, we show that: (1) indicated preventive interventions, targeting adolescents and young adults experiencing subthreshold symptoms, may often be more effective in reducing mental disorder prevalence than universal interventions delivered to the general population (contrary to the widely accepted view that a 'high risk' prevention strategy, focussing on those individuals with the greatest risk of developing a disorder, will generally be less effective than a whole-population strategy); and (2) the ability of selective preventive interventions (targeting vulnerable, asymptomatic youth) to alter the prevalence of mental disorders is severely restricted by an inverse relationship between the prevalence of significant risk factors for mental illness and the relative risk of developing symptoms.
© 2023. The Author(s).