Air pollution is a ubiquitous threat, affecting 99% of the global populace and causing millions of premature deaths annually. Monitoring ambient air quality is essential, aiding policymakers and environmental agencies in timely interventions. This study delves into the advantages of slower gas sensors over their ultrafast counterparts, with a keen focus on their practicality in real-world scenarios. Slow sensors offer accurate time-averaged exposure assessments, harmonizing with established regulatory benchmarks. Their heightened precision and reliability, complemented by their cost-effectiveness, render them eminently suitable for large-scale deployment. The slow sensing ensures compatibility with regulations, fostering robust risk management practices. In contrast, ultrafast sensors, while claiming rapid detection, despite touting swift detection capabilities, grapple with formidable challenges. The sensitivity of ultrafast sensors to uncontrolled atmospheric effects, fluctuations in pressure, rapid response times, and uniform gas dispersion poses significant hurdles to their reliability. Addressing these issues assumes paramount significance in upholding the integrity of air quality assessments.
Keywords: ambient monitoring; limit of detection; resistive sensors; slow sensing; ultrafast sensors.