Prediction of Electron Beam Welding Penetration Depth Using Machine Learning-Enhanced Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling

Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;23(21):8687. doi: 10.3390/s23218687.

Abstract

The necessity for precise prediction of penetration depth in the context of electron beam welding (EBW) cannot be overstated. Traditional statistical methodologies, including regression analysis and neural networks, often necessitate a considerable investment of both time and financial resources to produce results that meet acceptable standards. To address these challenges, this study introduces a novel approach for predicting EBW penetration depth that synergistically combines computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling with artificial neural networks (ANN). The CFD modelling technique was proven to be highly effective, yielding predictions with an average absolute percentage deviation of around 8%. This level of accuracy is consistent across a linear electron beam (EB) power range spanning from 86 J/mm to 324 J/mm. One of the most compelling advantages of this integrated approach is its efficiency. By leveraging the capabilities of CFD and ANN, the need for extensive and costly preliminary testing is effectively eliminated, thereby reducing both the time and financial outlay typically associated with such predictive modelling. Furthermore, the versatility of this approach is demonstrated by its adaptability to other types of EB machines, made possible through the application of the beam characterisation method outlined in the research. With the implementation of the models introduced in this study, practitioners can exert effective control over the quality of EBW welds. This is achieved by fine-tuning key variables, including but not limited to the beam power, beam radius, and the speed of travel during the welding process.

Keywords: artificial neural networks; beam characterisation; computational fluid dynamics modelling; electron beam welding; machine learning; penetration depth prediction.

Grants and funding

This publication was made possible by the sponsorship and support of Lloyd’s Register Foundation and Lancaster University. Lloyd’s Register Foundation helps to protect life and property by supporting engineering-related education, public engagement, and the application of research. The research was enabled through, and undertaken at, the National Structural Integrity Research Centre (NSIRC), a postgraduate engineering facility for industry-led research into structural integrity established and managed by TWI through a network of both national and international universities. This study is also supported by Joining 4.0 Innovation Centre (J4IC) and Cranfield University.