Comparing polymer-surfactant complexes to polyelectrolytes

Isaac J Gresham; Edwin C Johnson; Hayden Robertson; Joshua D Willott; Grant B Webber; Erica J Wanless; Andrew R J Nelson; Stuart W Prescott

doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.101

Comparing polymer-surfactant complexes to polyelectrolytes

J Colloid Interface Sci. 2024 Feb:655:262-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.101. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

Authors

Isaac J Gresham¹, Edwin C Johnson², Hayden Robertson², Joshua D Willott², Grant B Webber², Erica J Wanless², Andrew R J Nelson³, Stuart W Prescott⁴

Affiliations

¹ School of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia.
² College of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, 2308, NSW, Australia.
³ ANSTO, Locked Bag 2001, Kirrawee DC, 2232, NSW, Australia.
⁴ School of Chemical Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: s.prescott@unsw.edu.au.

PMID: 37944374
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.101

Abstract

Hypothesis: Understanding the complex interactions between polymers and surfactants is required to optimise commercially relevant systems such as paint, toothpaste and detergent. Neutral polymers complex with surfactants, forming 'pearl necklace' structures that are often conceptualised as pseudo-polyelectrolytes. Here we pose two questions to test the limits of this analogy: Firstly, in the presence of salt, do these polymer-surfactant systems behave like polyelectrolytes? Secondly, do polymer-surfactant complexes resist geometric confinement like polyelectrolytes?

Experiments: We test the limits of the pseudo-polyelectrolyte analogy through studying a poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) brush in the presence of sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS). Brushes are ideal for interrogating pseudo-polyelectrolytes, as neutral and polyelectrolyte brushes exhibit distinct and well understood behaviours. Spectroscopic ellipsometry, quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring (QCM-D), and neutron reflectometry (NR) were used to monitor the behaviour and structure of the PNIPAM-SDS system as a function of NaCl concentration. The ability of the PNIPAM-SDS complex to resist geometric confinement was probed with NR.

Findings: At a fixed SDS concentration below the zero-salt CMC, increasing NaCl concentration <100 mM promoted brush swelling due to an increase in osmotic pressure, not dissimilar to a weak polyelectrolyte. At these salt concentrations, the swelling of the brush could be described by a single parameter: the effective CMC. However, at high NaCl concentrations (e.g., 500 mM) no brush collapse was observed at all (non-zero) concentrations of SDS studied, contrary to what is seen for many polyelectrolytes. Study of the polymer-surfactant system under confinement revealed that the physical volume of surfactant dominates the structure of the strongly confined system, which further differentiates it from the polyelectrolyte case.

Keywords: Electrolyte; Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide); Polymer brushes; Responsive polymers; Sodium dodecylsulfate; Surfactants.