Effectiveness of a novel chelating agent in removing calcium hydroxide using conventional and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques

Mehmet-Omer Gorduysus; Melahat Gorduysus; Lovely-Muthiah Annamma

doi:10.4317/jced.60782

Effectiveness of a novel chelating agent in removing calcium hydroxide using conventional and passive ultrasonic irrigation techniques

J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Oct 1;15(10):e827-e834. doi: 10.4317/jced.60782. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Authors

Mehmet-Omer Gorduysus¹, Melahat Gorduysus², Lovely-Muthiah Annamma^{3

4}

Affiliations

¹ DDS,PhD, Professor, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
² DDS, PhD, Professor in Endodontics, Private Practice, Apollon Dental Center, Antalya, Türkiye.
³ BDS, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, United Arab Emirates.
⁴ Assistant Professor, Center of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.

Abstract

Background: The present in vitro study aimed to compare the efficacy of a 25% copolymer of acrylic acid and maleic acid [poly(AA-co-MA)] and 17% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing calcium hydroxide (CH) from root canals using the master apical file (MAF) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI).

Material and methods: Fifty-eight teeth were dressed with CH. After 10 days, CH was removed using MAF+EDTA, MAF+poly(AA-co-MA), PUI+EDTA, and PUI+poly (AA-co-MA) (n=12). Ten teeth were used as controls. Residual CH was evaluated using a four-grade scoring system. Data analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, and Dunn-Bonferroni tests.

Results: In the MAF and PUI groups, there was no significant difference in the CH scores between EDTA and Poly(AA-co-MA) (p<0.083). Although EDTA and poly(AA-co-MA) had lower CH scores when used with PUI, no significant difference was found between the two agents (p<0.083).

Conclusions: Poly(AA-co-MA) did not remove significantly more CH than EDTA when used with MAF or PUI. Key words:Calcium hydroxide, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, Acrylic acid, Maleic acid.