Introduction: Gastric epithelial tumors exhibit morphological heterogeneity, diverse biological behaviors, and different oncopathological pathways. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) proposed a molecular classification of gastric adenocarcinomas based on genetic and molecular findings, which shows particular characteristics of diagnosis, prognosis, and indirectly, therapeutic alternatives. Within this classification, Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) subtypes stand out as subtypes that present a less aggressive biological behavior and a highly mutilated phenotype. This study conducted a systematic review with an emphasis on epidemiological and prognostic factors based on the molecular classification proposed by TCGA.
Methods: A broad, comprehensive, and reproducible search with methodological rigor was conducted for study selection using the ROBINS-I and GRADEpro protocols and appropriate combinations of keywords.
Results: A total of 25 studies were selected: six with a complete classification similar to TCGA and 19 with a distinction between MSI-H and EBV+. The application of meta-analysis calculations reinforces the prevalence of positive Epstein-Barr adenocarcinomas in males and high microsatellite instability in females, with a high level of certainty of evidence and low risk of bias in the analyzed studies due to the rigorous methods used.
Conclusion: The molecular classification proposed by TCGA shows limited dissemination, with MSI-H and EBV+ subtypes being the most researched, probably due to the benefit of the association with immunotherapies. However, the subclassification cannot be restricted to less than a quarter of the cases, and improvements in this aspect are urgent for the construction of knowledge on this important topic of global health.
Keywords: EBV+ adenocarcinoma; MSI‐H adenocarcinoma; gastric adenocarcinoma; molecular classification; systematic review.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.