Cognitive reappraisal in mHealth interventions to foster mental health in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Karolina Morello; Sarah K Schäfer; Angela M Kunzler; Lilli-Sophie Priesterroth; Oliver Tüscher; Thomas Kubiak

doi:10.3389/fdgth.2023.1253390

Cognitive reappraisal in mHealth interventions to foster mental health in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Front Digit Health. 2023 Oct 20:5:1253390. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1253390. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Karolina Morello¹, Sarah K Schäfer^{1

2}, Angela M Kunzler^{1

3}, Lilli-Sophie Priesterroth⁴, Oliver Tüscher^{1

5

6}, Thomas Kubiak⁴

Affiliations

¹ Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR) Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
² Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Diagnostics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany.
³ Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
⁴ Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
⁵ Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
⁶ Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of mHealth interventions aim to contribute to mental healthcare of which interventions that foster cognitive reappraisal may be particularly effective.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of mHealth interventions enhancing cognitive reappraisal to improve mental health in adult populations.

Methods: The literature search (four databases) yielded 30 eligible randomized controlled trials (comprising 3,904 participants). We performed a multi-level meta-analysis to examine differences between intervention and comparator conditions at post-intervention assessment. Moderator analyses were conducted for potential moderator variables (e.g., type of comparators).

Results: Most interventions were CBT-based with other training components in addition to cognitive reappraisal. We found preliminary evidence for a small to medium effect favouring mHealth interventions to enhance cognitive reappraisal over comparators, M(SMD) = 0.34, p = .002. When analysing single symptoms, there was evidence for a small to medium effect of mHealth interventions on anxiety and depressive symptoms, but not for psychological distress and well-being. All analyses showed substantial heterogeneity. Moderator analyses revealed evidence for more favourable effects in studies with passive comparators. There was an overall high risk of bias in most of the studies.

Conclusions: We found preliminary evidence for a small to medium effect of mHealth interventions including a cognitive reappraisal component to improve mental health. However, most of the interventions were complex (i.e., reappraisal was provided alongside other components), which prevents us from examining reappraisal-specific effects beyond general mental health promotion in mHealth. Dismantling studies examining the effects of single intervention components are warranted to corroborate these promising results.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=142149, identifier [CRD42019142149].

Keywords: cognitive restructuring; ecological momentary intervention; mHealth; mental health; mental health apps; meta-analysis; reappraisal; systematic review.

Publication types

Review

Grants and funding

This project has received funding from: the State of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany (DRZ EMA/EMI program, Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 777084 (DynaMORE project) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG Grant CRC 1193, subprojects C04 & Z03). The publication of this article was funded by the Open Access Fund of the Leibniz Association.