Moral Injury Among Interventional Radiologists

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To evaluate moral injury (MI) among interventional radiologists using validated assessment tools.

Materials and methods: An anonymous 29-question online survey was distributed to interventional radiologists using the Society of Interventional Radiology Connect Open Forum website, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and electronic mail. The survey consisted of demographic and practice environment questions, a global quality of life (QoL) scale (scored 1-100), the MI Symptom Scale‑Healthcare Professional (MISS-HP) (scored 1-100), and two open-ended questions. A MISS-HP score ≥ 36 was indicative of experiencing MI. P < .05 was considered statistically significant for all two-sided tests.

Results: Beginning on March 30, 2023, 365 surveys were completed over 5 days. Of the respondents, 299 (81.9%) were male, 65 (17.8%) were female, and one preferred not to disclose gender. The respondents included practicing interventional radiologists (299; 81.9%) and interventional radiologists-in-training (66; 18.1%). Practice settings included academic (146; 40.0%), community (121; 33.2%), hybrid (84; 23.0%), or other (14; 3.8%) centers. Mean QoL was 71.1 ± 17.0 (range: 0-100) suggestive of "good" QoL. Mean QoL in the MI subgroup was significantly different from that for the rest of the group (67.6 ± 17.0 vs. 76.6 ± 16.0; P < 0.05). 223 (61.1%) respondents scored ≥ 36 on the MISS-HP, and thus were categorized as having profession-related MI. Mean MISS-HP was 39.9 ± 12.6 (range: 10-83). Mean MISS-HP in the MI subgroup was significantly different from that for the rest of the group (47.4 ± 9.6 vs. 28.0 ± 5.7; P < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between MI and QoL (r = -0.4; P < 0.001). Most common themes for greatest contribution to MI were ineffective leadership, barriers to patient care, corporatization of medicine, non-physician administration, performing futile procedures, turf battles, and reduced resources. Most common themes for ways to reduce MI were more autonomy, less bureaucracy, more administrative support, physician-directed leadership, adequate staffing, changes to the medical system, physician unionization, transparency with insurance companies, more time off, and leaving medicine/retirement.

Conclusion: MI is prevalent among interventional radiologists, and it negatively correlates with QoL. Future work should investigate causative factors and mitigating solutions.

Keywords: Anxiety; Burnout; Mental health interventional radiology; Moral injury; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Quality of life; Wellness.