Designing economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in maternal health care: A guide for clinical trial design

Birth. 2024 Jun;51(2):405-412. doi: 10.1111/birt.12796. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

Abstract

Background: Economic evaluations are being conducted with increasing frequency in the maternity care setting, with more randomized controlled trials containing a health economic component. Key emerging criticisms of economic evaluation in maternity care are lack of robust data collection and measurement, inconsistencies in methodology, and lack of adherence to reporting guidelines.

Methods: This article provides a guide to the design of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials in maternal health. We include economic concepts and considerations for the maternity setting and provide examples from the UK and Australia.

Results: There are many important considerations for the design of economic evaluations alongside clinical trials. To be effective, researchers must select types of economic evaluation, which align with their study objectives; choose an appropriate evaluation perspective, time horizon, and discount rate; and identify accurate ways to measure and evaluate health outcomes and costs.

Discussion: This guide is written for noneconomists and can be used for designing economic evaluations to be conducted as a part of clinical trials. We seek to improve the quality, consistency, and transparency of economic evaluations in maternal health.

Keywords: RCT; health economics; value based healthcare.

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Maternal Health / economics
  • Maternal Health / standards
  • Maternal Health Services / economics
  • Maternal Health Services / standards
  • Pregnancy
  • Research Design*
  • United Kingdom