Predictive Ability of Ultrasound on Neonatal Diagnoses and Consequences on Prenatal Care Utilization

Abstract

Fetal anomalies suspected on fetal ultrasound may cause significant stress for patients. Some findings resolve or have minimal clinical significance for the neonate. Our purpose is to evaluate fetal ultrasound accuracy and false-positive results and determine the clinical impact on maternal counseling. A retrospective review was performed on electronic medical records for women receiving prenatal care at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center who had abnormal findings on fetal ultrasounds between January 2015 and December 2018. Corresponding neonatal medical records were reviewed for the suspected condition(s). χ2 and Fisher exact tests were conducted to assess associations between fetal ultrasounds and neonatal outcomes. Two hundred eight mothers and 237 babies (including all 29 sets of twins) were included in the final analysis. Fetal ultrasounds were significantly associated with neonatal findings for the following conditions (sensitivity, specificity): anatomical disorder of extremities (0.72, 0.97), anatomical disorder of the face/skull/brain (0.67, 0.91), congenital anomaly of gastrointestinal tract (0.75, 0.98), congenital heart disease (0.75, 0.91), genetic disorder (0.72, 1.00), growth restriction (1.00, 0.85), kidney disorder (0.55, 0.98), and large for gestational age (0.80, 0.98). The highest false-positive rates occurred in congenital heart disease (65.4%), anatomical disorder of the face/skull/brain (64.3%), and growth restriction (54%). Fetal ultrasound highly correlates with neonatal findings for many congenital conditions. However, it can also be associated with a high false-positive rate for certain diagnoses; maternal counseling should include the limitations of ultrasound, including the potential for false-positive results.