Host habitat rather than evolutionary history explains gut microbiome diversity in sympatric stickleback species

Aruna M Shankregowda; Prabhugouda Siriyappagouder; Marijn Kuizenga; Thijs M P Bal; Yousri Abdelhafiz; Christophe Eizaguirre; Jorge M O Fernandes; Viswanath Kiron; Joost A M Raeymaekers

doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232358

Host habitat rather than evolutionary history explains gut microbiome diversity in sympatric stickleback species

Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 12:14:1232358. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232358. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Aruna M Shankregowda¹, Prabhugouda Siriyappagouder¹, Marijn Kuizenga¹, Thijs M P Bal¹, Yousri Abdelhafiz¹, Christophe Eizaguirre², Jorge M O Fernandes¹, Viswanath Kiron¹, Joost A M Raeymaekers¹

Affiliations

¹ Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
² School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Host-associated microbiota can influence host phenotypic variation, fitness and potential to adapt to local environmental conditions. In turn, both host evolutionary history and the abiotic and biotic environment can influence the diversity and composition of microbiota. Yet, to what extent environmental and host-specific factors drive microbial diversity remains largely unknown, limiting our understanding of host-microbiome interactions in natural populations. Here, we compared the intestinal microbiota between two phylogenetically related fishes, the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and the nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) in a common landscape. Using amplicon sequencing of the V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, we characterised the α and β diversity of the microbial communities in these two fish species from both brackish water and freshwater habitats. Across eight locations, α diversity was higher in the nine-spined stickleback, suggesting a broader niche use in this host species. Habitat was a strong determinant of β diversity in both host species, while host species only explained a small fraction of the variation in gut microbial composition. Strong habitat-specific effects overruled effects of geographic distance and historical freshwater colonisation, suggesting that the gut microbiome correlates primarily with local environmental conditions. Interestingly, the effect of habitat divergence on gut microbial communities was stronger in three-spined stickleback than in nine-spined stickleback, possibly mirroring the stronger level of adaptive divergence in this host species. Overall, our results show that microbial communities reflect habitat divergence rather than colonisation history or dispersal limitation of host species.

Keywords: adaptation; adaptive divergence; evolutionary history; host habitat; host microbiota; sticklebacks; symbiotic microbiota.