A robust design strategy for active control of scattered sound based on virtual sensing

Xiaoyan Cui; Xiaolin Wang; Wanyu Yang; Zeqiang Zhang; Ming Wu; Jun Yang

doi:10.1121/10.0021885

A robust design strategy for active control of scattered sound based on virtual sensing

J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Oct 1;154(4):2539-2552. doi: 10.1121/10.0021885.

Authors

Xiaoyan Cui^{1

2}, Xiaolin Wang¹, Wanyu Yang^{1

2}, Zeqiang Zhang^{1

2}, Ming Wu^{1

2}, Jun Yang^{1

2

3}

Affiliations

¹ Key Laboratory of Noise and Vibration Research, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
² School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
³ State Key Laboratory of Acoustics, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

PMID: 37874219
DOI: 10.1121/10.0021885

Abstract

Combining virtual sensing (VS) with scattered sound control enables active acoustic cloaking when there are limitations in sensor configurations. The remote microphone method and additional filter method (AFM) are two common VS methods, and both can be divided into the training and control stages; the consistency of the environments in these two stages is essential for the control system. This paper investigates the effects of uncertainties in the incidence angle of the detection wave on these two VS-based scattered sound control methods. Following the analysis, we propose a robust design strategy based on the optimal layout of physical sensors, and the placement scheme is chosen by minimax optimization. The feasibility of the proposed strategy is verified by numerical simulations of a finite-length cylindrical scattering model. The results demonstrate that the proposed strategy can effectively reduce the degradation of system performance over the examined range of variations in the detection waves. In particular, the AFM-based method, combined with optimal placement, shows a remarkable improvement in robustness. It improves the worst noise reduction by approximately 14.5 and 10.8 dB on average, respectively, compared with the uniform placement and the direct control method based on the Wiener solution.