Pediatric thyroid cancer: Socioeconomic disparities and their impact on access to care

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the disparities in access to care for pediatric thyroid cancers. We sought to clarify socioeconomic and patient factors that affect access to care for pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer.

Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective study on pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer (2004-2019). Patients were divided into three periods (2004-2008, 2009-2013, 2014-2019) to assess for trends. The χ² analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to test for independence of groupings for each socioeconomic and disease-related factor.

Results: In all, 6,275 patients with pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and 182 with aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer were analyzed. Differentiated thyroid cancer patients with Medicaid (median 18.0 miles) and those from lower-income households (median 21-30 miles) had to travel greater distances for care in recent years (2014-2019). Racial/ethnic disparities were evident; Black and Hispanic patients have higher odds of waiting >30 days for surgery (odds ratio 1.39, 1.49, P < .05, respectively) than White patients. Black patients with differentiated thyroid cancer had a higher risk of mortality compared with White and Hispanic patients (hazard ratio 4.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-9.51, P < .05). Nodal positivity was higher in Hispanic patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (60%, P < .05, White patients 51% and Black patients 36%). Socioeconomic factors did not significantly affect survival or nodal positivity in aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer.

Conclusion: This study highlights disparities in access to care and survival outcomes in pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer and aggressive variants of papillary thyroid cancer. Race, income status, and type of insurance all play a role in these disparities. Understanding the complex etiologies and developing interventions to improve access and patient outcomes are crucial.