Compounding Education in US PharmD Curricula

Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Oct;87(10):100117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100117. Epub 2023 May 24.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the extent of compounding education (CE) offered in United States (US) doctor of pharmacy curricula.

Methods: A 24-item survey instrument addressing various aspects of CE was developed and validated. An email containing the link to the survey instrument was shared with instructors of compounding at 122 of 141 accredited schools and colleges of pharmacy in the US.

Results: Of these, 112 schools and colleges responded, rendering a survey response rate of 91.8%. Survey results indicate that CE is offered to a similar extent either as a required standalone course or as integrated instruction as part of a standard course. Whereas 70.8% of programs reported mostly hands-on training in CE in their curricula, there were about 11% programs that mostly offered didactic instruction in CE. Dispersed systems and semisolid formulations are the most prepared in nonsterile compounding, while proper hand washing, garbing, and gloving are the most taught techniques in sterile compounding. Compounding education is delivered principally by pharmaceutics faculty (62.3%) compared to practice faculty (32.1%).

Conclusion: The survey determined the extent to which CE is addressed across different schools and colleges of pharmacy in the US. Although some institutions lack minimal nonsterile or sterile compounding facilities, they may improve by modeling the established programs in the country. Leadership at pharmacy institutions may need to allocate funds for CE, and support faculty who instruct in compounding.

Keywords: Compounding education; Nonsterile compounding; Pharmacy curriculum survey; Sterile compounding.

MeSH terms

  • Curriculum
  • Education, Pharmacy* / methods
  • Education, Pharmacy, Graduate* / methods
  • Humans
  • Schools, Pharmacy
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United States