End of Life Care for Unplanned Vascular Admissions

Abstract

Background: Unplanned vascular admissions have a high mortality. Previous studies have indicated that end of life care (EoLC) among this group of patients is low but there exist limited data on EoLC in the United Kingdom. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and predictors of EoLC for unplanned vascular admissions to a tertiary center in the United Kingdom.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of unplanned vascular surgery admissions from August 1, 2019 to January 22, 2020. Data on patient demographics, markers of quality of palliative care, mortality, and cause of death of unplanned admission to the vascular surgery department were collected from hospital and general practitioner records and evaluated against EoLC to evaluate predictors and efficacy of EoLC. Quality of palliative care markers included documentation of preferred place of death and care priorities, time spent in hospital and the intensive care unit toward the end of life, and realization of documented care objectives. EoLC input was defined as a dedicated palliative care consultation (PCC) by a palliative care professional, medical doctor, surgeon, or advanced care practitioner. We also conducted a subgroup analysis of patients within this group with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), diabetic foot, and ruptured aortic aneurysms, as all patients in this group should be offered EoLC according to international guidelines.

Results: One-hundred and fifty patients were included. Median age at presentation was 70.5 years, and the cohort consisted of mostly men (72%). CLTI (31%) was the most common reason for admission. Surgical intervention was carried out in 60% of patients. Two-year mortality was 36%, and pneumonia (22%) was the most common cause of death. Seven percent of patients received PCC, which occurred a median of 10 days before death. Only a minority of patients had preferred place of care/death (14%), care priorities (37%), and family involvement during advance care planning (17%) documented in their notes; 29% of patients had Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment forms in place. A diagnosis of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, chronic kidney disease, and increasing age predicted Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment form completion. Patients with PCC were more likely to have advance care planning, but this did not translate into improvements in the other markers of quality of palliative and, consequently, EoLC.

Conclusions: EoLC was insufficient and of low quality despite a high mortality in this group. Clinical guidelines and pathways are needed to ensure these patients are considered for EoLC and those with CLTI, diabetic foot sepsis or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are offered it by default. Further research is needed to help identify vascular patients who would benefit from EoLC earlier to improve quality at end of life.