Global economic costs of alien birds

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 18;18(10):e0292854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292854. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The adverse impacts of alien birds are widespread and diverse, and associated with costs due to the damage caused and actions required to manage them. We synthesised global cost data to identify variation across regions, types of impact, and alien bird species. Costs amount to US$3.6 billion, but this is likely a vast underestimate. Costs are low compared to other taxonomic groups assessed using the same methods; despite underreporting, alien birds are likely to be less damaging and easier to manage than many other alien taxa. Research to understand why this is the case could inform measures to reduce costs associated with biological invasions. Costs are biassed towards high-income regions and damaging environmental impacts, particularly on islands. Most costs on islands result from actions to protect biodiversity and tend to be low and one-off (temporary). Most costs at mainland locations result from damage by a few, widespread species. Some of these costs are high and ongoing (permanent). Actions to restrict alien bird invasions at mainland locations might prevent high, ongoing costs. Reports increased sharply after 2010, but many are for local actions to manage expanding alien bird populations. However, the successful eradication of these increasingly widespread species will require a coordinated, international response.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biodiversity*
  • Birds / physiology
  • Ecosystem
  • Introduced Species*
  • Population Dynamics

Grants and funding

Our work was supported by the French National Research Agency [ANR-18-EBI4-0004-07, 2018]; the BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative [2014-00000004292, 2014]; the AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology [2019]; and the AlienScenario project funded by BiodivERsA and Belmont-Forum call 2018 on biodiversity scenarios [I 4011-B32, 2018]. Our funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.