Objective: To compare the neonatal outcomes of early preterm births according to delivery indications and determine the obstetric risk factors associated with adverse outcomes.
Methods: We retrospectively studied pregnancies delivered between 22 + 0 and 26 + 6 weeks at the tertiary center between April 2013 and April 2022. Stillbirths, elective termination of pregnancy, and multifetal pregnancies were excluded. Patients were classified into two groups according to delivery indications: spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) due to premature rupture of membranes (PROM), preterm labor, or acute cervical insufficiency; and indicated preterm birth (iPTB). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results: Of the 121 neonates, 73 % (88/121) underwent sPTB. The overall survival rates were 73 % and 49 % in the sPTB and iPTB groups, respectively (p = 0.017). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with adjustment for gestational age at delivery, fetal growth restriction, cesarean section, histological chorioamnionitis, and funisitis. Moreover, in the 1-year follow-up, the proportion of body mass below the third percentile was significantly higher in the iPTB-group than in the sPTB-group (53 % vs. 20 %, p = 0.019). Furthermore, diagnoses of developmental delay and cerebral palsy were slightly higher in the iPTB-group (33 % and 20 %, respectively) than in the sPTB-group (27 % and 9 %, respectively); however, this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: In early preterm births, iPTB was associated with a higher neonatal mortality than sPTB.
Keywords: Neonate; Preeclampsia; Preterm birth; Preterm labor; Previable preterm birth.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.