Background: There is a large diversity of mucosal immunologic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) endotypes across Western and Asian patient populations.
Objectives: The objective of the study was whether the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) 2020 criteria for type 2 inflammation are appropriate for biological use in CRSwNP patients.
Methods: A total of 207 participants are enrolled for the study. Retrospective evaluations of the tissues taken during surgery and the patients' clinical features were performed. We investigated whether the criteria described in the EPOS2020 guideline were appropriate based on the criteria for type 2 inflammation identified based on prior studies using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.
Results: The EPOS 2020 criteria are also shown to be an insufficient evaluation approach with low specificity (area under curve [AUC] = 0.645, specificity 8.4%). The authors created a novel scoring method using the total serum IgE level, blood eosinophil percentage, and tissue eosinophil percentage. This novel scoring system (AUC = 0.862, p < .001) fared better in ROC analyses than the EPOS 2020 criteria (AUC = 0.645) and Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis scoring system (AUC = 0.647).
Conclusions and significance: A novel standard for type 2 inflammation in Asian CRSwNP patients must be established, as the EPOS 2020 criteria do not appear to be sufficient.
Keywords: guideline; inflammation; monoclonal antibodies; nasal polyp; sinusitis.