Construct and criterion validity of the HEXACO Medium School Inventory Extended (MSI-E)

PLoS One. 2023 Oct 13;18(10):e0292813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292813. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

In this cross-sectional study we aimed at: 1) validating the observer (Obs) version of HEXACO Medium School Inventory Extended (MSI-E); 2) establishing convergent and divergent construct validity of the HEXACO-MSI-E; 3) establishing criterion validity of HEXACO-MSI-E. We administered the HEXACO-MSI-E, the Big Five Questionnaire-Children (BFQ-C), the Internalizing and Externalizing scales of Youth Self Report (YSR), some items of the 2019 Middle School Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRB) and some items about adolescents' values, beliefs, behaviors, and desired features of a possible future job to 1175 adolescents (Mage = 12.03, SD = 0.89) and the observer version of these measures (except for BFQ-C) to 854 parents or legal guardians. The factorial structure and the reliability of the Observer Report of HEXACO-MSI-E were confirmed. Convergent and divergent validity were successfully established with a version of the inventory filled out by parents. Convergent and divergent validity were also established with BFQ-C notwithstanding some only apparent anomalies. Criterion validity was established with respect to four specific groups of criteria collected in both self-report and observer form. HEXACO-MSI-E traits were more predictive with respect to self-report than to observer criteria and the majority were common. Together with the positive results of this study, implications and issues for future studies are discussed.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Humans
  • Personality Inventory
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Schools*

Grants and funding

The project EMERGE (ID 389) has been funded by the programme V:ALERE 2019 of the University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” (D.R. 906 del 4/10/2019, prot. n. 157264, 17/10/2019). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. https://www.psicologia.unicampania.it/home-emerge/27-emerge/1558-home-emerge-en.