In-class transition from bortezomib-based therapy to IRd is an effective approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Future Oncol. 2024 Jan;20(3):131-143. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0272. Epub 2023 Oct 9.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of in-class transition to all-oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) following parenteral bortezomib (V)-based induction versus continued V-based therapy in US oncology clinics. Patients & methods: Non-transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) receiving in-class transition to IRd (N = 100; US MM-6), or V-based therapy (N = 111; INSIGHT MM). Results: Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, overall response rate was 73.2% with IRd versus 57.5% with V-based therapy (p < 0.0001). Median duration of treatment was 10.8 versus 5.3 months (p < 0.0001). Overall, 18/24% of patients discontinued IRd/V-based therapy due to adverse events. Conclusion: IRd after V-based induction was associated with significantly improved overall response rate and duration of treatment than continued V-based combination therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: US MM-6: NCT03173092; INSIGHT MM: NCT02761187 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Keywords: In-class transition; Ixazomib; oral therapy; proteasome inhibitor.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Boron Compounds / adverse effects
  • Bortezomib / adverse effects
  • Dexamethasone
  • Glycine
  • Humans
  • Lenalidomide / therapeutic use
  • Multiple Myeloma* / diagnosis
  • Multiple Myeloma* / drug therapy

Substances

  • Bortezomib
  • Lenalidomide
  • Dexamethasone
  • Glycine
  • Boron Compounds

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03173092
  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02761187