One and Done? The Effectiveness of a Single Session of Physiotherapy Compared With Multiple Sessions to Reduce Pain and Improve Function and Quality of Life in Patients With a Musculoskeletal Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-analyses

Marc-Olivier Dubé; Sarah Dillon; Kevin Gallagher; Jake Ryan; Karen McCreesh

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.017

One and Done? The Effectiveness of a Single Session of Physiotherapy Compared With Multiple Sessions to Reduce Pain and Improve Function and Quality of Life in Patients With a Musculoskeletal Disorder: A Systematic Review With Meta-analyses

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct 5:S0003-9993(23)00549-X. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.017. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Marc-Olivier Dubé¹, Sarah Dillon², Kevin Gallagher³, Jake Ryan³, Karen McCreesh²

Affiliations

¹ Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: marc-olivier.dube.1@ulaval.ca.
² School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
³ School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

PMID: 37805175
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.09.017

Abstract

Objective: To compare single and multiple physiotherapy sessions to improve pain, function, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs).

Data sources: AMED, Cinahl, SportsDiscus, Medline, Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and reference lists.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single and multiple physiotherapy sessions for MSKDs.

Data extraction: Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 and Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

Data synthesis: Six RCTs (n=2090) were included (conditions studied: osteoporotic vertebral fracture, neck, knee, and shoulder pain). Meta-analyses with low-certainty evidence showed a significant pain improvement at 6 months in favor of multiple sessions compared with single session interventions (3 RCTs; n=1035; standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.53; P=.02) but this significant difference in pain improvement was not observed at 3 months (4 RCTs; n=1312; SMD: 0.39; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.89; P=.13) and at 12 months (4 RCTs; n=1266; SMD: -0.05; 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.39; P=.82). Meta-analyses with low-certainty evidence showed no significant differences in function at 3 (4 RCTs; n=1583; SMD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.21; P=.56), 6 (4 RCTs; n=1538; SMD: 0.06; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.23; P=.53) and 12 months (4 RCTs; n=1528; SMD: 0.08; 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.25; P=.30) and QoL at 3 (4 RCTs; n=1779; SMD: 0.08; 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.17; P=.12), 6 (3 RCTs; n=1206; SMD: 0.03; 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.14; P=.59), and 12 months (4 RCTs; n=1729; SMD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.07; P=.58).

Conclusions: Low certainty meta-analyses found no clinically significant differences in pain, function, and QoL between single and multiple physiotherapy sessions for MSKD management for the conditions studied. Future research should compare the cost-effectiveness of those different models of care.

Keywords: Evidence-based practice; Musculoskeletal pain; Pain; Pain management; Physical therapy; Quality of life; Rehabilitation.

Publication types

Review