Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey

Julien O Teitler; Valentina Chegwin; Linda Li; Kayuet Liu; Peter S Bearman; Marilyn A Gorney-Daley; Nancy E Reichman

doi:10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052

Trends in Elective Deliveries in California and New Jersey

AJPM Focus. 2022 Nov 24;2(1):100052. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100052. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Authors

Julien O Teitler¹, Valentina Chegwin¹, Linda Li¹, Kayuet Liu^{2

3}, Peter S Bearman⁴, Marilyn A Gorney-Daley⁵, Nancy E Reichman⁶

Affiliations

¹ School of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, New York.
² Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
³ RIKEN Center for Brain Science (CBS), Wako-shi, Japan.
⁴ Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, New York.
⁵ New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, New Jersey.
⁶ Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean section deliveries in the U.S. increased from 5% of births in 1970 to 32% in 2020. Little is known about trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies (i.e., those for which interventions would not be medically necessary). This study addresses the following questions: (1) what is the prevalence of elective deliveries at the population level?, (2) how has that changed over time?, and (3) to what extent do the rates of elective deliveries vary across the population?

Methods: We first documented long-term trends in cesarean sections in the U.S., California, and New Jersey. We then used linked birth and hospital discharge records and an algorithm based on Joint Commission guidelines to identify low-risk pregnancies and document trends in cesarean sections and inductions in low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey over a recent 2-decade period, overall and by maternal characteristics and gestational age.

Results: In low-risk pregnancies in California and New Jersey, rates of cesarean sections and inductions increased sharply from the early 1990s through the mid-2000s, peaked at 33% in California and 41% in New Jersey in 2007, and then declined somewhat, and the proportions of inductions that were followed by cesarean sections increased from fewer than 1 in 5 to about 1 in 4. More education, non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity, U.S.-born status, and non-Medicaid were associated with higher rates of interventions. Trends were similar across all socioeconomic groups, but differences have been narrowing in California. Among early-term (gestational age of 37-38 weeks) births in low-risk pregnancies, the rates of elective deliveries increased substantially in both states until the mid/late-2000s, peaked at about 35% in California and over 40% in New Jersey, and then decreased in both states to about 20%.

Conclusions: Given established health risks of nonmedically necessary cesarean sections, that a nontrivial share of induced deliveries in low-risk pregnancies result in cesarean sections, and that interventions in low-risk pregnancies have not substantially declined since their peak in the mid-2000s, the trends documented in this paper suggest that sustained, even increased, public health attention is needed to address the still-too-high rates of cesarean sections and inductions in the U.S.

Keywords: Elective deliveries; Joint Commission; cesarean sections; induced deliveries; low-risk pregnancies; trends.

Abstract

Grants and funding