Who chooses alternative sources of information about childhood vaccinations? A cross-sectional study

Rosa Katia Bellomo; Vito Cerabona; Azzurra Massimi; Giuseppe Migliara; Michele Sparano; Francesco Novello; Tiziana Schilirò; Roberta Siliquini; Paolo Villari; Corrado De Vito

doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1225761

Who chooses alternative sources of information about childhood vaccinations? A cross-sectional study

Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 13:11:1225761. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1225761. eCollection 2023.

Affiliations

¹ Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
² A.S.L. City of Turin, Turin, Italy.
³ Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
⁴ A.O.U. City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy can lead to problematic outcomes in terms of public health. A factor playing a fundamental role in this dynamic is the source of information considered by parents in the decision-making progress that leads to the acceptance or refusal of childhood vaccinations. This study aims to investigate the sources of information considered by the parents of children attending primary and secondary schools in two large Italian cities and to identify predictors that led to choosing alternative sources of information.

Methods: An online questionnaire was administered to the parents of students attending elementary, middle, and high schools in Rome and Turin. Two validated tools were used: the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines Survey and the Vaccine Health Literacy of adults in Italian. Sources of information about vaccinations, trust toward the healthcare system, hesitancy and attitudes about COVID-19 vaccinations, were also investigated. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of the preferred sources of information on the topic.

Results: Totally, 2,301 answers to the survey were collected from June to October 2021. Of these, 1,127 came from parents in Rome (49%) and 1,174 from parents based in Turin (51%) with a mean age of 47.7 years (±6.4). The majority of the respondents were mothers (81%), married (73%), with two or more children (70.5%). The multivariable logistic regression model results showed that fathers were more inclined than mothers to use alternative sources of information (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.29-2.00). Moreover, a higher level of vaccine hesitancy was a strong predictor for choosing alternative sources of information (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.73-3.46). The HLVa-it scores show that parents with a lower Vaccine Literacy (VL) were more inclined to use alternative sources of information.

Discussion: Addressing health literacy issues and changing the official forms of communication could help improving vaccine acceptance. This study shows the importance of rebuilding a trusting relationship between patients and health care providers, which is fundamental in the fight against vaccine hesitancy.

Keywords: health literacy; infodemic; parents; sources of information; vaccine hesitancy.