The design of inorganic materials for various applications critically depends on our ability to manipulate their synthesis in a rational, robust, and controllable fashion. Different from the conventional trial-and-error approach, data-driven techniques such as the design of experiments (DoE) and machine learning are an effective and more efficient way to predictably control materials synthesis. Here, we present a Viewpoint on recent progress in leveraging such techniques for predicting and controlling the outcomes of inorganic materials synthesis. We first compare how the design choice (statistical DoE vs machine learning) affects the type of control it can offer over the resulting product attributes, information elucidated, and experimental cost. These attributes are supported by discussing select case studies from the recent literature that highlight the power of these techniques for materials synthesis. The influence of experimental bias is next discussed, followed finally by our perspectives on the major challenges in the widespread implementation of predictable and controllable materials synthesis using data-driven techniques.