[Efficacy of decitabine in patients with glucocorticoid-resistant primary immune thrombocytopenia: factors influencing treatment responses]

Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jul 14;44(7):567-571. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2023.07.008.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of decitabine (DAC) and identify factors influencing treatment responses in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who had failed glucocorticoid therapy. Methods: Clinical data of 61 patients with glucocorticoid-resistant ITP who received DAC therapy (5 mg·m(-2)·d(-1)×3 d via intravenous infusion) for at least three cycles with 3-4-week intervals at the Department of Hematology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, from November 2015 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The 61 patients comprised 20 males and 41 females, with a median age of 45 years (range: 15-81 years). Among them, 43 patients were glucocorticoid-dependent (glucocorticoid-dependent group), while 18 patients were glucocorticoid-resistant (glucocorticoid-resistant group). Following DAC treatment, 12 patients (19.67% ) achieved complete response (CR), and 16 patients (26.23% ) exhibited response (R), resulting in an overall response (OR) rate of 45.90% (28/61). Comparison between the OR group (n=28) and the non-response (NR) group (n=33) revealed significant differences in responses to glucocorticoids (dependent or resistant) and platelet counts before treatment (χ(2)=8.789, P=0.003; z=-2.416, P=0.016). The glucocorticoid-dependent group showed higher platelet counts than the glucocorticoid-resistant group after the second and third cycles of DAC treatment (P=0.032, 0.024). Moreover, the OR rates after the first, second, and third cycles of DAC treatment in the glucocorticoid-dependent group were all higher than those in the glucocorticoid-resistant group (P=0.042, P=0.012, P=0.029). A significant correlation was observed between glucocorticoid dependence and responses to DAC treatment (OR=9.213, 95% CI 1.937-43.820, P=0.005) . Conclusion: DAC demonstrates definitive efficacy with mild adverse effects in a subset of patients with glucocorticoid-resistant primary ITP. Glucocorticoid dependence and higher platelet counts before treatment are associated with a favorable response to DAC therapy.

目的: 评估地西他滨(DAC)在糖皮质激素治疗失败原发免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)中的疗效及影响因素。 方法: 纳入2015年11月至2021年6月在山东大学齐鲁医院血液科接受DAC治疗(5 mg·m(-2)·d(-1)×3 d静脉滴注,至少应用3个疗程,每疗程间隔3~4周)的61例糖皮质激素治疗失败ITP患者,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。 结果: 61例患者中,男20例,女41例。中位年龄45(15~81)岁。糖皮质激素依赖43例,无效18例。DAC治疗后,12例(19.67%)患者获得完全反应(CR),16例(26.23%)有效(R),总有效(OR)率为45.90%(28/61)。DAC治疗OR组(28例)与无效组(NR,33例)比较,糖皮质激素的反应性(依赖或无效)、治疗前血小板计数差异具有统计学意义(χ(2)=8.789,P=0.003;z=-2.416,P=0.016)。糖皮质激素依赖组与糖皮质激素无效组比较,DAC治疗2、3疗程后血小板计数较高(P=0.032、0.024);DAC治疗1、2、3疗程OR率比较,糖皮质激素依赖组均高于糖皮质激素无效组(P=0.042,P=0.012,P=0.029)。糖皮质激素依赖与DAC疗效具有明显相关性(OR=9.213,95% CI 1.937~43.820,P=0.005)。 结论: DAC对于部分糖皮质激素治疗失败的ITP患者具有确切的疗效且不良反应轻微。糖皮质激素依赖、治疗前血小板计数高的患者DAC疗效较好。.

Keywords: Decitabine; Efficacy; Influencing Factor; Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Decitabine / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Glucocorticoids* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic* / drug therapy
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Decitabine
  • Glucocorticoids
  • teloxantrone