Objectives: Even if survival of post and core (PC) itself was frequently investigated in recent literature, clinical data concerning the risk for extraction of teeth restored with PC is still scarce. Since most authors found the loss of retention of refitable post and cores as the most common cause of failure, it is impossible to draw a conclusion on tooth survival on the results of those studies. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to improve the clinical evidence on the survival of teeth treated with post and cores on a large number of cases over a long observation period.
Materials and methods: 735 patients were treated with 1053 post and cores in the observation period (2004-2022) and could be included in the study. The patient files were analysed due to the parameters: Type of covering prosthetic restoration, location, type of tooth, luting material, post and core material, bone attachment and therapist. The survival probability was assessed using Kaplan-Meyer analysis. Cox regression was used to assess possible multifactorial influences.
Results: The overall average survival time until necessary extraction of a tooth restored with a post and core was 11.74 years. A root fracture in primary crown retained removeable partial dentures (RPDs) during the first five years was the most common reason for extraction in this study. A significant influence on the survival time of teeth restored with post and cores was found for the type of covering restoration, bone attachment, age of the patient and post and core material.
Conclusions: Post and core restored teeth should be avoided as abutments for primary crown retained RPDs.
Clinical significance: If it is inevitable to utilise post and core restored teeth for primary crown retained RPDs, post and core materials with matching mechanical properties to that of dentine should be preferred.
Keywords: Cox regression; Kaplan-Meyer analysis; Post and core; Retrospective study; Survival time.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.