[A pragmatic comparison of fetal biometry curves]

Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2023 Nov-Dec;51(11-12):524-530. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Introduction: The fetal biometrics charts recommended in France for ultrasound screening include measurements of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BIP), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). New international growth standards have been recommended since 2022. The aim of this work is to quantitatively describe the differences between these biometric curves.

Methods: The biometry curves from the French College for Fetal Ultrasound, OMS and INTERGROWTH-21 are pragmatically compared based on their original quantile regression equations (superposition and quantification of differences in millimeters and in proportion) for different percentiles of clinical interest.

Results: Compared with the new charts, CFEF underestimates HC<-3DS and AC<10eP. The proportions of differences between the CFEF and INTERGROWTH-21 or WHO curves always remained <5%. The proportions of difference of the 3rd percentile of HC and FL, 10th and 90th percentile of AC were always lower than 2%, 2%, 5% and 4% respectively, between OMS and INTERGROWTH-21.

Conclusion: The switch to prescriptive standards suggests an improvement in the detection of fetuses with AC<10th percentile, an improvement in the detection of prenatal onset microcephaly, with no argument for a decrease in the detection rate of severe constitutional bone disease or modification of obstetrical guidelines.

Keywords: Biometry; Biométrie; Courbes de croissance; Growth Charts; Prenatal; Ultrasonography; Échographie prénatale.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Biometry
  • Female
  • Fetus* / diagnostic imaging
  • Gestational Age
  • Humans
  • Obstetrics*
  • Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Care
  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal