A novel rapid detection method for a single-nucleotide substitution mutation derived from canine urothelial and prostatic carcinoma cells present in small amounts in urine sediments

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 21;18(9):e0286229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286229. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

For early detection of canine urothelial and prostatic carcinoma, we intend to develop and commercialize a simple and rapid detection method for the BRAF V595E mutation, a known mutation in this cancer. Detection of the single-nucleotide substitution in cancer cells contained in urine sediments is effective for early cancer diagnosis. However, urine sediment also contains many normal cells, and when there is a small relative composition of cancer cells, the mutation is difficult to detect by conventional methods other than next-generation sequencing. Our new detection method enables reliable discrimination with the same labor and cost as the PCR method. We compared the results of our new method with the results of the conventional Sanger method for 38 canine urine sediment samples, and the results of 34 samples were consistent between both methods. The remaining four results were all determined to be negative by the Sanger method and positive by our new method. For these four samples, the ratio of the mutated gene to the wild-type gene was estimated using a third-generation sequencer, and the ratio of the mutated gene was 0.1%-1.4%. We postulate that the Sanger method gave a negative result because of the low abundance of the mutated gene in these samples, proving the high sensitivity of our new method.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Body Fluids*
  • Carcinoma*
  • Dogs
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mutation
  • Nucleotides
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / genetics

Substances

  • Nucleotides

Grants and funding

This study was supported by Kurume Research Park Co., Ltd. (https://www.krp.ktarn.or.jp/) from 2019 to 2021. S Okumura and Y Ohsato were jointly received the grant with no number. Provider is an organization, not an individual. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.