Assessing the impact of technological change on similar occupations: Implications for employment alternatives

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 18;18(9):e0291428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291428. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: The fast-changing labor market highlights the need for an in-depth understanding of occupational mobility impacted by technological change. However, we lack a multidimensional classification scheme that considers similarities of occupations comprehensively, which prevents us from predicting employment trends and mobility across occupations. This study fills the gap by examining employment trends based on similarities between occupations.

Method: We first demonstrated a new method that clusters 756 occupation titles based on knowledge, skills, abilities, education, experience, training, activities, values, and interests. We used the Principal Component Analysis to categorize occupations in the Standard Occupational Classification, which is grouped into a four-level hierarchy. Then, we paired the occupation clusters with the occupational employment projections provided by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. We analyzed how employment would change and what factors affect the employment changes within occupation groups. Particularly, we specified factors related to technological changes.

Results: The results reveal that technological change accounts for significant job losses in some clusters. This poses occupational mobility challenges for workers in these jobs at present. Job losses for nearly 60% of current employment will occur in low-skill, low-wage occupational groups. Meanwhile, many mid-skilled and highly skilled jobs are projected to grow in the next ten years.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the utility of our occupational classification scheme. Furthermore, it suggests a critical need for skills upgrading and workforce development for workers in declining jobs. Special attention should be paid to vulnerable workers, such as older individuals and minorities.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Educational Status
  • Employment*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knowledge
  • Labor, Obstetric*
  • Occupations
  • Pregnancy

Grants and funding

This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation (https://www.nsf.gov/) [award number 2041215: Preparing the Future Workforce for the Era of Automated Vehicles] (EM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.