Determinants of experience & satisfaction in telehealth psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients & providers

Michael Morreale; Ilana Cohen; Michael Van Wert; Alexis Beccera; Leslie Miller; William Narrow; Barbara Schweizer; Jason Straub; Peter Zandi; Anne Ruble

doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1237249

Determinants of experience & satisfaction in telehealth psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients & providers

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 1:14:1237249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1237249. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Mood Disorders Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
² Johns Hopkins Resident Outpatient Continuity Clinic, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
³ Johns Hopkins Bayview Community Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
⁴ Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bayview Community Psychiatry Program, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to characterize the experiences and overall satisfaction of patients and providers with the March 2020 transition to telehealth in a psychiatric setting (telepsychiatry). The study also investigated how socio-demographic and clinical characteristics impact an individual's experiences and satisfaction with telepsychiatry.

Methods: Responses were collected from 604 patients and 154 providers engaged in clinical care at one of three participating Johns Hopkins Medicine outpatient psychiatric clinics between January 2020-March 2021. Survey data were collected by self-report via Qualtrics or telephone follow-up.

Results: Respondents were predominately female and White. Over 70% of patients and providers were generally satisfied with telepsychiatry. However, providers were more likely to favor in-person care over telepsychiatry for post-pandemic care 48% to 17% respectively, while 35% rated both modalities equivalently. Patients were more evenly divided with 45% preferring telepsychiatry compared to 42% for in-person care, and only 13% rating them equivalently. Among providers, technical difficulties were significantly associated with both less satisfaction and lower preference for telepsychiatry [odds ratio for satisfaction (OR_S) = 0.12; odds ratio for preference (OR_P) = 0.13]. For patients, factors significantly associated with both lower satisfaction and lower preference for telepsychiatry included technical difficulties (OR_S = 0.20; OR_P = 0.41), unstable access to the internet (OR_S = 0.46; OR_P = 0.50), worsening depression (OR_S = 0.38; OR_P = 0.36), and worsening anxiety (OR_S = 0.41; OR_P = 0.40). Factors associated with greater satisfaction and higher preference for telepsychiatry among patients included higher education (OR_S = 2.13; OR_P = 1.96) and a decrease in technical difficulties over time (OR_S = 2.86; OR_P = 2.35).

Discussion: Patients and providers were satisfied with telepsychiatry. However, there were greater differences between them in preferences for continuing to use telepsychiatry post-pandemic. These findings highlight factors that influence patient and provider preferences and should be addressed to optimize the use of telepsychiatry in the future.

Keywords: quality improvement; survey; telehealth; telemedicine; telepsychiatry.