INTRAORAL SCANNING AND CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION MAY HAVE SIMILAR TIME EFFICIENCY FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE CROWNS AND THREE-UNIT FIXED TOOTH-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES

Iman Abd-Elwahab Radi; Mohamed Amr ElKhashab

doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101894

INTRAORAL SCANNING AND CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION MAY HAVE SIMILAR TIME EFFICIENCY FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE CROWNS AND THREE-UNIT FIXED TOOTH-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES

J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2023 Sep;23(3):101894. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101894. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

Authors

Iman Abd-Elwahab Radi, Mohamed Amr ElKhashab

PMID: 37689444
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101894

Abstract

Article title and bibliographic information: Bandiaky ON, Le Bars P, Gaudin A, Hardouin JB, Cheraud-Carpentier M, Mbodj EB, Soueidan A. Comparative assessment of complete-coverage, fixed tooth-supported prostheses fabricated from digital scans or conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jan;127(1):71-79. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.017. Epub 2020 Nov 2. PMID: 33,143,901.

Source of funding: Information not available TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of data.

Keywords: Conventional impression; Crown; Digital impression; Digital scan; Fixed partial denture; Tooth supported bridge.

Publication types

Comment

MeSH terms

Crowns*
Humans
Prostheses and Implants*