Differences in intracortical responses following non-noxious and noxious stimulation in anaesthetized rats

Brain Res. 2023 Dec 15:1821:148564. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148564. Epub 2023 Sep 9.

Abstract

Cortical responses have been proposed as a source for the extraction of unique and non-subjective sensory information. The present study aimed to investigate if it is possible to distinguish between non-noxious and noxious cortical responses with two different types of anesthesia. Sixteen rats were randomly allocated to receive either Hypnorm/Dormicum (HD) or isoflurane (ISO) anesthesia. Each animal had a custom-made microelectrode array implanted in the primary somatosensory cortex to record the local field potentials and a cuff electrode implanted around the sciatic nerve to deliver electrical stimulations. Three stimulation intensities were applied: 1x movement threshold (MT) (i.e., non-noxious activation), 5x MT (low intensity noxious activation), and 10x MT (high intensity noxious activation). The evoked potentials were assessed by extracting three features: 1) the negative peak (NP), 2) the positive peak (PP), and 3) the peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes. Our results showed that it was possible to distinguish between three levels of stimulation intensities based on the NP, PP, and PtP features for the HD group, whereas it was only possible to make the same differentiation with the use of PP and PtP when applying ISO. This work is believed to contribute to a basic understanding of how the cortical responses change in the hyperacute phase of pain and which cortical features may be suitable as objective measures of nociception.

Keywords: Electrical stimulation; Intracortical; Nociception; Non-noxious; Noxious; Rat.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia*
  • Animals
  • Electric Stimulation / methods
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Isoflurane* / pharmacology
  • Pain
  • Physical Stimulation
  • Rats
  • Somatosensory Cortex / physiology

Substances

  • Isoflurane