Molecular complexity (MC) lacks a universal definition, but various studies address it in contexts ranging from ligand-receptor interactions to DNA sequencing, with the overarching emphasis being its significance in synthetic organic chemistry and pharmaceutical research. Efforts to quantify MC in drug discovery have been numerous, but a unified approach remains challenging. Strategies based on graph theory, information theory, and substructural feature counts employed to gauge MC are often correlated to molecular weight (MW). Herbert Waldmann and his team introduced a new MC metric called the spacial score (SPS), which is based on factors like atom hybridization and stereoisomeric considerations. While SPS and its normalized version, nSPS, correlate with the natural product likeness score, they do not align with traditional chemical properties. We examined nSPS trends for approved drugs and found no significant changes in MC over eight decades, nor did nSPS capture drug innovation during that period. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that while the majority of approved drugs have an nSPS value between 10 and 20, this metric does not correlate with key drug properties like target bioactivity and oral bioavailability. Mirroring a chemist's intuitive sense of chemical complexity, nSPS addresses the need for a precise empirical tool while a universal definition of MC remains elusive.