Diagnostic pitfalls in patients referred for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Heart Rhythm. 2023 Dec;20(12):1720-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.08.035. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is challenging because of nonspecific clinical findings and lack of conclusive answers from genetic testing (ie, an ARVC-related variant is neither necessary nor sufficient for diagnosis). Despite the revised 2010 Task Force Criteria, patients are still misdiagnosed with ARVC.

Objective: In patients referred for ARVC, we sought to identify the clinical characteristics and diagnostic confounders for those patients in whom ARVC was ultimately ruled out.

Methods: Patients who were referred to our center with previously diagnosed or suspected ARVC (between January 2011 and September 2019; N = 726) were included in this analysis.

Results: Among 726 patients, ARVC was ruled out in 365 (50.3%). The most common presenting symptoms in ruled-out patients were palpitations (n = 139, 38.1%), ventricular arrhythmias (n = 62, 17.0%), and chest pain (n = 53, 14.5%). On the basis of outside evaluation, 23.8% of these patients had received implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and device extraction was recommended in 9.0% after reevaluation. An additional 5.5% had received ICD recommendations, all of which were reversed on reevaluation. The most frequent final diagnoses were idiopathic premature ventricular contractions/ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (46.6%), absence of disease (19.2%), and noncardiac presyncope/syncope (17.5%). The most common contributor to diagnostic error was cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, including mistaken right ventricular wall motion abnormalities (33.2%) and nonspecific fat (12.1%).

Conclusion: False suspicion or misdiagnosis was found in the majority of patients referred for ARVC, resulting in inappropriate ICD implantation or recommendation in 14.5% of these patients. Misdiagnosis or false suspicion was most commonly due to misinterpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Keywords: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Misdiagnosis; Task Force Criteria.

MeSH terms

  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac
  • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia* / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia* / genetics
  • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia* / therapy
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular*