From complexity to clarity: how directed acyclic graphs enhance the study design of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;39(1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01042-z. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Abstract

While frameworks to systematically assess bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) and frameworks on causal inference are well established, they are less frequently integrated beyond the data analysis stages. This paper proposes the use of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) in the design stage of SRMAs. We hypothesize that DAGs created and registered a priori can offer a useful approach to more effective and efficient evidence synthesis. DAGs provide a visual representation of the complex assumed relationships between variables within and beyond individual studies prior to data analysis, facilitating discussion among researchers, guiding data analysis, and may lead to more targeted inclusion criteria or set of data extraction items. We illustrate this argument through both experimental and observational case examples.

Keywords: Causality; Epidemiologic factors; Epidemiologic methods; Meta-analysis as topic; Research design.

MeSH terms

  • Bias
  • Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Research Design*
  • Systematic Reviews as Topic