Genetic diversity analysis and molecular characteristics of wild centipedegrass using sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers

PeerJ. 2023 Aug 24:11:e15900. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15900. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro) Hack.) is commonly used as a low-maintenance warm-season turfgrass owing to its excellent adaptation to various soil types. A better understanding of the genetic diversity pattern of centipedegrass is essential for the efficient development and utilization of accessions. This study used fifty-five pairs of primers to detect the genetic variation and genetic structure of twenty-three wild centipedegrass accessions by Sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers. A total of 919 reliable bands were amplified, among which 606 (65.80%) were polymorphic and 160 (2.91%) were the monomorphic loci. The average polymorphic information content (PIC) value was 0.228. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) clustering analysis grouped the twenty-three accessions into two clusters. Meanwhile, the structure analysis showed that the tested accessions possessed two main genetic memberships (K = 2). The Mantel test significantly correlated the genetic and geographic distance matrices (r = 0.3854, p = 0.000140). Furthermore, geographical groups showed moderate genetic differentiation, and the highest intragroup genetic diversity was found in the Sichuan group (He = 0.201). Overall, the present research findings could promote the protection and collection of centipedegrass and provide comprehensive information to develop novel breeding strategies.

Keywords: Eremochloa ophiuroides; Genetic diversity; Morphological traits; SRAP.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acclimatization
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Genetic Drift
  • Plant Breeding*
  • Polymorphism, Genetic* / genetics

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the Seed Industry Vitalization Research Projects of Jiangsu Province (JBGS[2021]096) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071885). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.