Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-18 in Malaysian adolescents

Nur Afrina Rosharudin; Noor Azimah Muhammad; Tuti Iryani Mohd Daud; Suzana Mohd Hoesni; Siti Rashidah Yusoff; Mohamad Omar Ihsan Razman; Manisah Mohd Ali; Khairul Farhah Khairuddin; Dharatun Nissa Puad Mohd Kari

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289551

Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-18 in Malaysian adolescents

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 28;18(8):e0289551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289551. eCollection 2023.

Authors

Nur Afrina Rosharudin¹, Noor Azimah Muhammad², Tuti Iryani Mohd Daud³, Suzana Mohd Hoesni¹, Siti Rashidah Yusoff¹, Mohamad Omar Ihsan Razman¹, Manisah Mohd Ali⁴, Khairul Farhah Khairuddin⁴, Dharatun Nissa Puad Mohd Kari⁵

Affiliations

¹ Centre for Research in Psychology and Human Well-Being, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
² Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
³ Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
⁴ Centre for Research in Education and Community Wellbeing, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
⁵ Department of Counselor Education and Counseling Psychology, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.

Abstract

Objective: The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-18 (DERS-18) is an instrument used to measure deficits in emotion regulation. However, the instrument has not been adapted to Malaysians and has never been validated in the Malay language. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Malay version of DERS-18.

Method: The DERS-18 underwent forward-backward translation and assessment of face and content validity. Both Malay version of the DERS-18 and DASS-21 were completed by 701 adolescents (44.4% boys) aged 13 and 14 years old. To assess its dependability, a floor and ceiling effect evaluation and Cronbach's analysis were both performed. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), bivariate correlation, and regression were performed to evaluate the construct and criterion validity, respectively.

Results: The Malay version of DERS-18, after excluding "Awareness", indicated excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.93), and acceptable internal consistency for each subscale (range of α from 0.63 to 0.82). Floor or ceiling effects were observed at item level and subscale level, but not at total level. CFA results revealed that the Malay version of the DERS-18 bifactor model (excluding "Awareness") portrayed the best construct validity (χ2/df = 2.673, RMSEA = 0.049, CFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.968) compared to a single factor, a correlated factor, and a higher-order factor model. The DERS-18 subscales (except "Awareness") and DERS-18 total scores were significantly correlated with stress, anxiety, and depression in a positive direction (r ranged from 0.62 to 0.64, p < 0.01). The general factor of the DERS-18 and its specific factors ("Clarity", "Goals", and "Non-Acceptance") significantly predicted the symptoms of stress, anxiety, and depression (R2 ranged from 0.44 to 0.46, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Malay version of the DERS-18, excluding "Awareness", possessed good reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity to assess emotion dysregulation among Malaysian adolescents.

Copyright: © 2023 Rosharudin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Adolescent
Emotional Regulation*
Female
Humans
Language
Malaysia
Male
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results

Grants and funding

Manisah Mohd Ali received a fund from the Ministry of Higher education (MoHE) Malaysia (Project code: TRGS/1/2020/UKM/01/4/1). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.