Hemodialysis is the commonest kidney replacement therapy (KRT) globally and rapidly growing in developing countries, while in developed countries it is reaching a plateau. The penetration of hemodialysis (HD) varies widely among countries and is largely influenced by socioeconomics, healthcare financing, particularly by government, local infrastructure, healthcare workforce, health system characteristics, and affordability of the population. Biomedical equipment, consumables, disposables, and labor are major cost drivers of KRT. Implementing strategies to balance cost and quality of care is an arduous task for health care planning, delivery, and patient care in low- and middle-income countries. In this context, the cost of dialyzers which form a significant component of the recurring cost of HD can be reduced by reuse after appropriate reprocessing. But this practice is largely abandoned in developed countries because of concerns of safety. However, the evidence against the reuse of modern dialyzers is not robust and certainly not based on well-designed randomized trials. The industrialization of dialysis delivery, the interests of equipment manufacturers and the nature of dialysis delivery have propelled single use of dialyzers. In this context, developing countries needing to expand HD services access at low cost are caught at crossroads. Process improvements are needed to standardize reprocessing that prioritizes safety while maintaining effectiveness. Recent advances in mobile and internet technologies could make this an achievable reality. We propose such an approach that would ensure treatment effectiveness, patient and healthcare provider safety, efficient resource utilization, and cost control.
Keywords: Dialyzers; end stage kidney disease; hemodialysis; renal replacement therapy; reuse.