Progestogens for endometrial protection in combined menopausal hormone therapy: A systematic review

Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jan;38(1):101815. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2023.101815. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

Abstract

Menopausal women with an intact uterus choosing estrogens for menopausal symptom relief require a progestogen for endometrial protection. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the risks of endometrial hyperplasia resp. malignancy with different progestogens used in combined MHT. Overall, 84 RCTs were included. We found that 1) most studies were done with NETA, followed by MPA, MP and DYD and LNG, 2) most progestogens were only available as oral formulations, 3) the most frequently studied progestogens (oral MP, DYD, MPA, oral and transdermal NETA, transdermal LNG) were assessed in continuously as well as in sequentially combined MHT regimens, 4) FDA endometrial safety criteria were only fulfilled for some progestogen formulations, 5) most studies demonstrated endometrial protection for the progestogen dose and time period examined. However, 6) study quality varied which should be taken into account, when choosing a combined MHT, especially if off-label-use is chosen.

Keywords: endometrial biopsy; endometrial cancer; endometrial hyperplasia; menopausal hormone therapy; progestogens.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Endometrial Hyperplasia* / chemically induced
  • Endometrial Hyperplasia* / drug therapy
  • Endometrial Hyperplasia* / prevention & control
  • Endometrium / pathology
  • Estrogen Replacement Therapy / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Hormone Replacement Therapy
  • Humans
  • Menopause
  • Progestins* / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Progestins