The Covid pandemic took the world by surprise in late 2019 and the need for rapid development of vaccines became paramount. The challenge was how to accelerate standard vaccine development times as much as possible. With knowledge of the genetic code of SARsCOV2, vaccine manufacturers throughout the world have risen to the challenge and several new vaccines were rapidly developed for emergency use. In March 2020, global Regulatory Authorities met to consider how to start early clinical trials and accept rolling submissions. Before use in clinical trials or any mass vaccination campaigns, the safety of the candidate vaccine needs to be evaluated. Non-clinical toxicology studies are required as an important part of vaccine safety evaluation. The extent of the toxicology evaluation prior to the start of clinical trials depended on several factors, including: the type of the candidate vaccine as well as already available supportive information with the candidate vaccine or similar vaccine types. For vaccine candidates with pre-existing data, this would save valuable time whilst a full toxicology evaluation was completed in parallel. For vaccines with more limited data, toxicology data was required before clinical development could start. This workshop examined the nonclinical toxicology studies for new Covid vaccines from the perspectives of: Vaccine manufacturers with different vaccine technologies, managing global regulatory submissions/responses; CROs, managing the urgency of conducting and reporting studies and supporting new players in the vaccine world; and Regulatory Authorities, in supporting the review process, juggling the need for safety and quality with mounting pressure to approve vaccines.
Copyright © 2023.