Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields-Different from General Public Exposure and Laboratory Studies

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Aug 9;20(16):6552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20166552.

Abstract

The designs of in vivo, in vitro and in silico studies do not adequately reflect the characteristics of long-term occupational EMF exposure; the higher exposure levels permitted for employees are nevertheless extrapolated on this basis. Epidemiological studies consider occupational exposure only in a very general way, if at all. There is a lack of detailed descriptive data on long-term occupational exposure over the duration of the working life. Most studies reflect exposure characteristics of the general population, exposures which are long-term, but at a comparably low level. Occupational exposure is often intermittent with high peak power followed by periods with no exposure. Furthermore, the EU EMF-Directive 2013/35/EU states a demand for occupational health surveillance, the outcome of which would be of great help to epidemiologists studying the health effects of EMF exposure. This paper thus aims to outline and specify differences between public and occupational exposure and to increase the understanding of specific aspects of occupational exposure which are important for long-term health considerations. This could lead to a future protection concept against possible hazards based on adequate descriptions of long-term exposures and also include supplementary descriptive features such as a "reset time" of biological systems and accurate dose quantities.

Keywords: biological effects; electromagnetic field; general population; health surveillance; workers.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Electromagnetic Fields / adverse effects
  • Epidemiologists
  • Humans
  • Occupational Exposure*
  • Occupational Health*

Grants and funding

Author M.-O.M. acknowledges funding from the NextGEM project from the Horizon Europe Research and Innovation program under Grant Agreement No 101057527 for part of this study. Views and opinions expressed are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The other authors received no external funding for this research.