A Multi-Centre Randomized Study Comparing Two Standard of Care Chemotherapy Regimens for Lower-Risk HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Curr Oncol. 2023 Aug 4;30(8):7384-7397. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30080535.

Abstract

Background: Neither paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (P-H) nor docetaxel-cyclophosphamide plus trastuzumab (TC-H) have been prospectively compared in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (EBC). A randomized trial was performed to assess the feasibility of a larger study.

Methods: Lower-risk HER2-positive EBC patients were randomized to either P-H or TC-H treatment arms. The co-primary feasibility outcomes were: ≥75% patient acceptability rate, active trial participation of ≥50% of medical oncologists, ≥75% and ≥90% treatment completion, and receipt rate of planned cycles of chemotherapy, respectively.

Secondary outcomes: Febrile neutropenia (FN) rate, treatment-related hospitalizations, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires. Analyses were performed by per protocol and intention-to-treat.

Results: Between May 2019 and March 2021, 49 of 52 patients agreed to study participation (94% acceptability rate). Fifteen (65%) of 23 medical oncologists approached patients. Rates of FN were higher (8.3% vs. 0%) in the TC-H vs. P-H arm. Median (IQR) changes in scores from baseline in FACT-Taxane Trial Outcome Index at 24 weeks were -4 (-10, -1) vs. -6.5 (-15, -2) for TC-H and P-H arms, respectively.

Conclusions: A randomized trial comparing P-H and TC-H was feasible. Expansion to a larger trial would be feasible to explore patient-reported outcomes of these adjuvant HER2 chemotherapy regimens.

Keywords: HER2-positive; chemotherapy; early-stage breast cancer; trastuzumab.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Breast Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Quality of Life
  • Standard of Care
  • Trastuzumab / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Trastuzumab

Grants and funding

Funding for this study was provided by London Regional Cancer Program Medical Oncology Research Fund (MORF) and infrastructure support from the ReThinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) program at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. We are also grateful to the Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Network (3CTN) for funding and operational support to conduct multicenter academic clinical trials at cancer centres across Canada.