Applying Topical Anesthetic on Pediatric Lacerations in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Project

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Mar 1;40(3):175-179. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003033. Epub 2023 Aug 25.

Abstract

Objectives: Caring for pediatric lacerations in the emergency department (ED) is typically painful because of irrigation and suturing. To improve this painful experience, we aimed to increase the use of a topical anesthetic, Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) on eligible pediatric lacerations with an attainable, sustainable, and measurable goal of 60%. The baseline rate of applying topical anesthetic to eligible lacerations was 23% in our ED. We aimed to increase the use of topical anesthetics on eligible pediatric lacerations to a measurable goal of 60% within 3 months of implementing our intervention.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, interrupted time series, ED quality improvement project from November 2019 to July 2020. A multidisciplinary team of physicians and nurses performed a cause-and-effect analysis identifying 2 key drivers: early placement of EMLA and physician buy-in on which we built our Plan, Do, Study, and Act (PDSA) cycles. We collected data on number of eligible patients receiving EMLA, as well as patient and physician feedback via phone calls within 2 days after encounter. Balancing measures included ED length of stay (LOS), patient and physician satisfaction with EMLA, and adverse effects of EMLA.

Results: We needed 3 PDSA cycles to reach our goal of 60% in 3 months, which was also maintained for 5 months. The PDSA cycles used educational interventions, direct provider feedback about noncompliance, and patient satisfaction results obtained via phone calls. Balancing measures were minimally impacted: 75% good patient satisfaction, no adverse events but an increase in LOS of patients who received EMLA compared with those who did not (1.79 ± 0.66 vs 1.41 ± 0.83 hours, P < 0.001). The main reasons for dissatisfaction for physicians were the increased LOS and the preference for procedural sedation or intranasal medications.

Conclusions: With a few simple interventions, our aim of applying EMLA to 60% of eligible pediatric lacerations was attained and maintained.

MeSH terms

  • Anesthetics, Local* / therapeutic use
  • Child
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Humans
  • Lacerations* / complications
  • Lacerations* / therapy
  • Lidocaine
  • Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination
  • Pain / etiology
  • Prilocaine
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality Improvement

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination
  • Lidocaine
  • Prilocaine