Risk of Infection After Septic and Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 18;105(20):1630-1637. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00361. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

Abstract

Background: The causes of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure can be divided into septic and aseptic etiologies. It is unclear whether the etiology affects the infection rate after revision TKA. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate whether there is a difference in infection rates between septic and aseptic revision TKA. We hypothesized that infection rates would be higher after septic revision TKA.

Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases and the Cochrane Library were searched to find studies evaluating infection rates following septic and aseptic revision TKA. We included studies that compared the postoperative infection rates of a group that received revision TKA for aseptic failure and a group that received 1- or 2-stage revision TKA for septic failure. Studies on re-revision TKA and on revision surgery after partial knee arthroplasty were excluded, as were studies of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR).

Results: Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. In studies in which 1- or 2-stage revision TKA was performed for septic failure, septic revision TKA had a significantly higher infection rate than aseptic revision TKA (odds ratio [OR], 6.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 30.33; p = 0.01). Similarly, in studies in which 2-stage revision TKA was performed for septic failure, septic revision TKA had a significantly higher infection rate than aseptic revision TKA (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.33 to 7.36; p < 0.00001). In the comparison of revision TKA for aseptic loosening and septic revision TKA, septic revision TKA had a higher infection rate than aseptic revision TKA (OR, 4.45; 95% CI, 2.28 to 8.70; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Overall, septic revision TKA had a higher infection rate than aseptic revision TKA. Even when 2-stage revision TKA was performed for septic failure, the infection rate was higher after septic revision TKA than after aseptic revision. Surgeons should explain the relatively high infection rates to patients undergoing revision TKA for septic failure of their primary joint replacement.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement* / adverse effects
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections* / epidemiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections* / etiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections* / surgery
  • Reoperation / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents